Today, I'm going to talk about professors, and the transition between graduate student to professor in the sciences. Both my parents are professors in microbiology, so I knew the words "publish or perish" by the time I was 7. Here's how professorship works, what a professor really does all day, and how this affects science and research.
When applying for a faculty position at a university in the sciences, here's what you need to keep in mind:
- Almost all schools will hire you as an Associate Professor and put you on a tenure track.
- Tenure track means that you have 6 years to "prove" yourself and your worth to your department
- At the end of 6 years, if you haven't published enough / gotten enough grants / done a good enough job teaching, you are fired.
- Once you are "fired" by a university, no university of higher or equal rank will ever accept you for a job again.
- If the university decides to keep you after 6 years, you get tenure and a job for life.
Therefore, those first 6 years can be very stressful. Here at UIUC, I've heard of 32 year old professors that sleep in their offices because they are so busy trying to get tenure.
Also, from the graduate student point of view, if your advisor doesn't have tenure and is fired, you might be given 1 year to complete your degree if you are close to finishing. Otherwise, you either have to move with your professor (if she stays in academia) or start all over from scratch, usually negating 2+ years of your progress.
Because those first 6 years are so important, most people do a post-doc. A post-doc is where you go work for yet another advisor for 2 years, doing all you can to publish your own papers and get your own grants so you have a head start during your 6 year trial period. The amount of time spent in a post-doc seems to vary on the competitiveness and age of the field. Computer science doesn't require but recommends a post-doc before applying for a faculty job. Five years ago, post-docs in CS were unheard of. My parents each did a post-doc in microbiology 30 years ago. Nowadays in Biology, Dani says you can't get a faculty job unless you've done at least 2 post-docs, or 4 extra years of school. Post-docs get paid slightly more than graduate students, perhaps $10/$17 an hour. The idea behind taking a post-doc is that you can build your research without worrying about all the obligations that being a professor brings.
Speaking of those obligations, here's what professors do for the majority of their day
- write papers and grants based off of the research of their students
- mentor and meet with students
- teach classes, advise undergraduates
- sit on committees
- budget grants
- other miscellaneous administrative tasks.
- network with other researchers
Notice how "researching" or "planning science" isn't on the list. If those things happen, they are squeezed in between all the other obligations. As a fellow student Tanya Crenshaw told me, "If research was like football, grad school would be a grueling boot camp that trains you to be the best quarterback you can be, and as soon as you graduate, you are hired into the position of head coach." My dad also complains about the lack of hands-on science at the professor level: "All I do is write and listen to people complain. I never get to do any science anymore."
You see, to be successful in science, you need money. My parents spend most of their days figuring out which government agencies they can beg for funding. They vote for whichever politicians will increase research spending, and they change their research goals to match the buzzwords of the moment. You have to do these things just to keep your money flowing. Once you have money, you hire graduate students and post-docs to do all the work (after all, they are cheap). Once you've hired people, you now have people who depend on you for their paychecks and life's goals. Therefore, you need to get even more money to cover lean times when grants don't get funded. This leads to a vicious cycle: as the labs grow, they produce better results, which leads to more money, which leads to more people. etc. Eventually, the money runs out, a grant doesn't get funded, and grad-students loose their jobs. Furthermore, as a beginning professor, you don't have students or money, so no one will fund you. Hence the post-doc -- you have more experience than grad students and can out-perform them. So you trade a few more years of blood, tears, and low pay so your publication list compares favorably to a professor with 2-3 graduate students already.
That's all for today. Tomorrow, I'll talk about how science is like advertising, perception and reality, and how science encourages bad practices like manufacturing false importance.
August 24 2007, 01:33:05 UTC 4 years ago
All of that was pretty much what convinced me never to pursue a career in science, despite always being really interested in it. Well, that and my parents flat-out telling me: DO NOT GO INTO SCIENCE IT WILL EAT YOUR SOUUUUUL.
But I still have tremendous respect for the profession, and if I had it to do all over again, I probably would have gone that route.
August 24 2007, 03:21:13 UTC 4 years ago
Having seen both sides of the aisle, I don't think science is any more soul sucking that the humanities, in fact I think it might suck your soul a tad less frequently. As proof, I cite the Ignoble awards.
My dad has said before that he wants his ashes spread in his kinexa when he dies, which is a machine which measures the force needed to pull molecules apart. I'm not sure he was kidding.
But yes, I do think the current system does take advantage of new and hopeful grad students. Industry might be closed and paranoid, but they compensate you properly and don't subject you to 6-10 years of intellectual servitude.
My advice: you came to grad school because you like doing something. Remember when you used to study for fun? Go and find something interesting and do it for fun. That's where your energy comes from, that's the real spirit of research that all these academic-games mask. I spend at least 1 hour a day now doing something I find interesting intellectually, no matter what. It's really helped.
August 24 2007, 04:50:40 UTC 4 years ago
For one, postdocs are very rare and a special thing if they happen. As are grants.
For two, there is no six-year time limit ... six years is usually the amount of time it takes you to go from Assistant to Associate, and it could be another six years at least before you're eligible for tenure.
For three, professors aren't expected to fund their students, or themselves. Nor do the students work "for" a certain professor; instead they supervise and work "with" students. Dad still can't figure out why an English professor would want to recruit someone to drain their time. Neither can I, really, but it seems to have happened to me so I'll take it.
August 24 2007, 11:25:40 UTC 4 years ago